TL; D. "eligible". I wonder if you have come out of passion, or if there is nothing else they did not like. In addition, you want to seek advice on potential communication again.

Not tl; D.
As for the context, I am a master’s degree in computer science graduates in December. I did some internal training (non -tenants) and I was working with the post -DOC stage in another project when I had the interview, but I did not get any full -time experience in the industry.

This role was for a co -advisor of the Salesforce Consulting company that I met through a professional exhibition. From the job description and what the job show table told me, the company was looking to fill its training program, and stated that the candidates did not need previous experience with the salesforce tools or consulting (I had no prior experience, but I expressed his willingness to learn).

They arrived at the phone screen, then interviewed a week after a week. When you want to be at least more prepared, I asked the recruiter if there were any resources that I can use to understand the tools, and I provided units before examination and interview.

During the interview, I think I wanted to show my energy and enthusiasm for this role, so I talked about how my previous experiences (although there is no actual consulting experience) very well with the role (many of my previous projects that involve a solution from zero to the product management). In the previous training, I participated in the comprehensive development of products, and felt that this type of comprehensive expectations for projects would be ideal for a consultant role, so I benefited from this.

When I was asked if I had previous experience in Salesforce, I frankly stated that the stereotypes they presented to me was the first real introduction to the Salesforce tools, but I also confirmed that I am ready to learn during the training program.

I finished the interview (which had somewhat strict cut for 30 minutes) and wondered whether my lack of the Slesforce experience was a problem. However, I received the email over two days after the interview (last Friday while I was on vacation, so I didn’t have much time to analyze the nuances of the email).

I have difficulty understanding what is meant "Slight"… I thought I was reasonably keen to share my experience, and I didn’t feel that it was a special thing I said. Moreover, do you not like enthusiasm companies? I am also confused to be eligible for importance when I did not work directly in this field. Part of me wonders if there is already something bigger they did not like, and they only say "eligible" To Sugarcoat.

I am considering sending an email to human resources to ask whether it can clarify what I felt in my interview, and how I can improve it. How should I do this?