Today, the Supreme Court targeted two of our rights in the first place stipulated in the constitution during the reconstruction: the fourteenth amendment, which defines American citizenship, and the fifteenth amendment, which realized that blacks had an equivalent force for white.

in Trump v. Casa, companyCourt Wipe Donald Trump to impose it Executive order Directing his administration not to identify the nationality of some people born to migrant parents in this country. It took this step despite the explicit language in the fourteenth amendment, saying that “all people born or naturalized in the United States, and are subject to the jurisdiction of it, are citizens of the United States and the state where they reside.” Although the Supreme Court’s decision did not judge the final legitimacy of the birth of the birth of birth in Trump, the fact that the majority of judges were ready to allow this matter to enter the ease of our basic rights.

Separately, the Supreme Court took another disgraceful step. After the 2020 census, Louisiana re -returned its areas of Congress and removed one of the black -majority areas. The lower court ruled that this procedure violated the voting rights law and forced Louisiana to redraw its lines. After doing this, white people challenge the new map as Gerrymander is unconstitutional. The court was supposed to rule today on whether the new map was constitutional. Instead of deciding the case, they asked the lawyers Re – In the fall.

The judges did not give a reason to take this unusual step. However, during the oral argument and in the past few years, they have appointed Republicans to the Supreme Court Argument The voting rights law does not correspond to the principles of equality included in the constitution because it requires states to attract majority areas in circumstances in some circumstances.

Republicans appointed to the Supreme Court earlier canceled the heart of the voting rights law, which banned countries with a history of black suppression and other people from the votes of the colored from the creation of more voters’ suppression and asking the federal government to precede any changes in the voting that they tried to make sure they did not do so. Therefore, the threat to the rest of the voting rights law here is very real.

Today’s dual attack on citizenship and voting rights should not be a shock. Amendments to the Reconstruction era-the thirteenth amendment that canceled slavery and ensuring that all people will have the right to the fruits of their work, and the fourteenth equality that determined the American amendment to vote on the right to vote the white people-well. In fact, as The historian Eric Foner indicatedThe reconstruction era, which has passed these amendments, has become aware that each of these rights is necessary to create a multi -ethnic democracy.

Today, with 150 approaches^Y The anniversary of the end of the reconstruction and subsequent terrorism in the southern countries that ended the multi -ethnic democratic experience, the actions of the Supreme Court show the fragility of these rights and the ease of taking them if we do not fight.

Place the jobs with justice to do more than the counterfeit system that could take away the nationality of people and voting rights. We are planning to join the allies and create a new reconstruction framework, which depends on both reconstruction amendments – the right of each person to freedom and the fruits of their work, the right to citizenship, equality, legal procedures, and the right to vote – to create a multi -power democracy that promised compensation.

Today, the Supreme Court targeted two of our rights in the first place stipulated in the constitution during the reconstruction: the fourteenth amendment, which defines American citizenship, and the fifteenth amendment, which realized that blacks had an equivalent force for white.

in Trump v. Casa, companyCourt Wipe Donald Trump to impose it Executive order Directing his administration not to identify the nationality of some people born to migrant parents in this country. It took this step despite the explicit language in the fourteenth amendment, saying that “all people born or naturalized in the United States, and are subject to the jurisdiction of it, are citizens of the United States and the state where they reside.” Although the Supreme Court’s decision did not judge the final legitimacy of the birth of the birth of birth in Trump, the fact that the majority of judges were ready to allow this matter to enter the ease of our basic rights.

Separately, the Supreme Court took another disgraceful step. After the 2020 census, Louisiana re -returned its areas of Congress and removed one of the black -majority areas. The lower court ruled that this procedure violated the voting rights law and forced Louisiana to redraw its lines. After doing this, white people challenge the new map as Gerrymander is unconstitutional. The court was supposed to rule today on whether the new map was constitutional. Instead of deciding the case, they asked the lawyers Re – In the fall.

The judges did not give a reason to take this unusual step. However, during the oral argument and in the past few years, they have appointed Republicans to the Supreme Court Argument The voting rights law does not correspond to the principles of equality included in the constitution because it requires states to attract majority areas in circumstances in some circumstances.

Republicans appointed to the Supreme Court earlier canceled the heart of the voting rights law, which banned countries with a history of black suppression and other people from the votes of the colored from the creation of more voters’ suppression and asking the federal government to precede any changes in the voting that they tried to make sure they did not do so. Therefore, the threat to the rest of the voting rights law here is very real.

Today’s dual attack on citizenship and voting rights should not be a shock. Amendments to the Reconstruction era-the thirteenth amendment that canceled slavery and ensuring that all people will have the right to the fruits of their work, and the fourteenth equality that determined the American amendment to vote on the right to vote the white people-well. In fact, as The historian Eric Foner indicatedThe reconstruction era, which has passed these amendments, has become aware that each of these rights is necessary to create a multi -ethnic democracy.

Today, with 150 approaches^Y The anniversary of the end of the reconstruction and subsequent terrorism in the southern countries that ended the multi -ethnic democratic experience, the actions of the Supreme Court show the fragility of these rights and the ease of taking them if we do not fight.

Place the jobs with justice to do more than the counterfeit system that could take away the nationality of people and voting rights. We are planning to join the allies and create a new reconstruction framework, which depends on both reconstruction amendments – the right of each person to freedom and the fruits of their work, the right to citizenship, equality, legal procedures, and the right to vote – to create a multi -power democracy that promised compensation.