Reading from and responding to Our God is your God, too, but he chose us: articles on Jewish powerWritten by Laurent Jinot.

Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7

(Art by Michel Horsley))

From the ninth chapter, “Freuyudi Complex: Sigmund Freud, sexual assault, and cover -up::

In essence, Judaism is the condemnation, which was absorbed depth of an early age, from the superiority of the Jews over the Jews-the “Mukhtar”. Anything that contradicts this superiority creates a perceived inconsistency of denial. . . . According to Wilhelm Reich, anti -Semitism is itself a symptom of sexual frustration and can be treated through sexual liberation (Collective psychology of fascism1934) – It improved Liu Benker theory that Judeophobia was a “genetic disease” and “uncovered” that is transmitted for two thousand years “(p. 177).

There is possible a lot to reach here, regarding the idea that “the primary goal of psychological analysis was Christian.” from Thomas szasz‘s The legend of psychotherapy:

One of Freud’s most powerful in life was the desire to take revenge on Christianity due to the anti -traditional anti -Semitism. . . . Freud knew himself, and he thought about himself, as a Jewish warrior, fighting against the hostile Christian scientist (pp. 146, 149).

Compare Szasz Freud with Monte Christo,

The humiliating victim, but the morally superiority, escapes dependence on his ethical, ethical victim; Hiding, plans, and growing strong; He returns to the place of his defeat, and there is unabated and subject to his former hole because they were insulting and subjected him (p. 147).

Instead of going into this Swamplaland, Guyénot moves to discuss the “Isaac Complex”, as the other side of the oedipus complex. Allow that “the cordon of the pent -up son to kill his father may be the most fertile intuition for Freud,” then he helps him “a bad circular. Only the nervous son of a devastating and manipulated father has a pent -up desire” to kill the Father “(p. 181).

After he found this motivation in himself, Guyénot, Freud argues his “display to all humanity” (the same reference). Then Freud’s Jewish students found that they had same The motivation, has become a widely accepted Freudian by the Jews. For guyénot,

Freud’s generalization. . . He suffered from the tendency of the Jewish intellectuals to present Jewish issues to all humanity. A child’s pent -up desire to kill his father is not a global person, but it may be a distinguished Jew. The Jewish father is the guardian of the Jew and the representative of the Jewish God (the same reference).

Guyénot again puts the Jewish parental energy of the Lord in a completely negative light; But it is clear that the licensee is not the antidote – as the goals of the sexual liberation of Freudianity (the conspiracy of Jewish revenge against Christianity or not) has proven.

To support his argument for Jewish personality disease, Guyénot quotes from 1906 The Jewish Encyclopedia:

“The Jews are subject to diseases of the nervous system more than the races and other peoples who live among them.” Research conducted by sociologists Liu Serroli in 1962 showed that the rate of nerves and personal disorders among the Jews were about three times a height between Catholics and Protestants (p. 185).

(What would Weldhm do that, I wonder?)

I can’t comment on the statistics, but it seems to Guyénot on a safer floor here. As a basic correlation of development, Tanakh, Torah and Talmud may have (when combined with infants and parental nerves that are inevitable)) some The harmful effects on the child’s mood and personality (ethical or other).

This raises the question about the degree in which any alleged “innate” properties of Jews (such as the Complex of Excellence) are cultural, not hereditary, the stimulation of nature, and the result of indoctrination instead of pollination. Take the child in eight days, and you can be reasonable for a man’s manufacture.

However, the basic point is the one that I do not think that Guyénot makes it explicit: no matter how the Jewish event is, it has been used nearly two thousand years ago. The main problem with Jewish belief and Jewish tribal identity (as Rudolph Steiner suggested more than a century ago) is that she had served more than the time of Christ.

In the tenth chapter, “The Marxist era: Karl Marx in the Lord’s Plan of Management”, Guyénot is cited Marx’s articles on the Jewish question, which took the form of critical reviews of two works by Bruno Power. Power was a pioneer figure among the Heights of the Hegelin, and his book was entitled Judenfrage dies, With a follow -up article, “the ability of the current Jews and Christians to become free.”

For Bouir as well, the religious, not racist side of Judaism was the problem. He said that the Jews could not be liberated politically, without its religious liberation. Since God chose him, it is the essence of their religion, their resistance to absorbing the Torah came and did not keep them separate permanently from other peoples, but also prevented them from respecting other peoples.

“The Jews cannot fade with the peoples and link their fate with their fate. The Jews must wait for a specific future designated for them alone, and the chosen people, and assures them of sovereignty in the world” (p. 193). For this reason, Power argued that the only way to be a free Jew is to stop being a Jew, because his sense of isolation and excellence were both symptoms of Jewish identity.

(One can say this about any kind of collective identity, whether from race, religion or the nation, is only that the Jewish identity is a more extreme and clear state than this-clearly with the nation-state of Israel).