“Protection of our people, not fossil fuel companies”: Non -governmental organizations in Singapore call for increased carbon tax transparency | News | Environmental works
Latest Job Opportunities in India
Discover top job listings and career opportunities across India. Stay updated with the latest openings in IT, government, and more.
Check Out Jobs!Read More
🔥 “Protection of our people, not fossil fuel companies”: Non -governmental organizations in Singapore call for increased carbon tax transparency | News | Environmental works
explained
In an open message published on Tuesday, the groups argued that although the carbon tax pathway in Singapore is progress, the granting of transitional allowances to the intensive sectors of emissions, such as Reuters reported last yearIt risks the weakness of the policy ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
“Effective carbon tax must protect our people, not fossil fuel companies,” said the letter that he participated in signing by non -profit Energy Colab, SG Climate Rally and LePakinsg.
In response to the open message, Singapore The National Climate Change Secretariat (NCCS) said that the transitional allowances for high players help to avoid the risk of carbon leakage – companies whose operations are converting into other judicial states at lower or not effective carbon prices.
“
Recipient companies have sparked correct concerns about how to use information related to carbon tax allowances to settle their strategies and operations.
A spokeswoman for the National Climate Change Secretariat in Singapore
“This is especially important amid current political and economic winds facing climate work. This result may lead to the loss of jobs and economic value of Singapore, with the absence of a general global reduction in emissions,” NCCS spokesman said.
He added that “The allowances are not a free pass for our intensive emissions (EITE) companies to continue emission. It is only provided for a percentage of corporate emissions, and qualified facilities must have clear credibility carbon carbon. “
Large suits for the big players
Singapore provided the first carbon tax in Southeast Asia in 2019, which covers the facilities responsible for about 70 percent of the country’s emissions. The price rose to $ 25 (CO₂E) in 2024, and is scheduled to reach $ 45 Singapore ($ 35) in 2026-27, where the government indicates a price range ranging between $ 50 and 80 USD (39-62 USD) by 2030.
However, the transitional allowance system Large agreements have drawn audit. Non -governmental organizations note that there is currently no general information about the amount of distributed allowances, the criteria used to grant them, or that actual actual carbon tax companies end the payment.
Reuters report suggested last year that refining refineries and petrochemical companies had received discounts of up to 76 percent, which reduced their actual rate to less than $ 6 Singapore ($ 4.7 USD) per ton. At the same time, and The Strait The times mentioned In June 2025, expected tax revenues decreased 358 million dollars ($ 279 million), indicating that coverage had decreased from 70 percent of national emissions to 45 percent.
The letter said: “This doubts the comprehensiveness of the carbon tax in Singapore,” and called for a disclosure at the level of the facility about the allowances, clarity on standard standards, and the publication of effective rates. Without such information, NGOs warned that the system risks to become a “permanent aid” of pollutants.
In response to the assurances of NGOs about the disclosure of allowances, the government said that publishing this information “must be balanced against the need to protect the legitimate commercial sensitivities of our companies,” and said it would take place Adjust the collected information about the carbon tax allowances in the “due”.
NCCS said Reckon The amount of allowances by linking them to the standards of industry efficiency, to encourage facilities to continuously improve and “be among the most efficient in carbon in the world.”
She said that the amount of disclosure will be reviewed regularly, which represents factors such as our economic competitiveness as well as international and technological developments related to climate, such as
The effect of carbon tax on families
NGOs also raised concerns about the increasing electronic prices for consumers, as companies transfer the cost of the tax.
They urged the government to protect weak living families through permanent discounts or gradual pricing plans, noting that families contribute only 6.2 percent of national emissions.
Non-governmental organizations estimate that a tax ranging between $ 50 and $ 80 Singapore (39-62 USD per ton can add about $ 103 Singapore ($ 80) a year to an average bill for an apartment of four rooms.
NCCS said it was “conscious” One of the possible effect of carbon tax on the expenses of living families, and government initiatives such as the $ 1.1 billion living package (857 million US dollars) were martyred to motivate families to reduce their carbon difficulty.
A meaningful general advice
The open message was also pressed for useful public advice before the government reviewed the carbon tax levels after 2028. While previous consultations attracted a strong participation-there were 580 respondents to the “carbon removal trip” exercise for the year 2024-the government did not always spread detailed responses to the notes, and noticed non-profit organizations.
“Public consultations cannot be a mono -directional exercise,” said the message. “Any deviation from the levels of carbon tax is clearly planned, with the detection of the stakeholders who support it.”
Non -governmental organizations called for the long time schedules of consultation, the use of citizens ’paintings, and the publication of each of the topics of comments and government responses to ensure the” closed reactions episode “.
NGOs said that Singapore has committed to reducing its emissions to 45-50 million tons by 2035, a decrease from about 60 million tons in 2030, and to reach zero zero by 2050.
“Transparency does not harm us; it makes our climatic policies stronger,” they wrote, warning that without repairs, allowances and exemptions can reduce the credibility of the tax and slow down the Singapore Structural Transitional needs.
NCCS said in response. ““The private sector and the civil society are constantly involved in setting climate policies, and holding a general consultation in 2017 to request notes on carbon tax policy.
The government said it would share more information about the carbon tax track after 2017 “in time.”
The open message appears in the following week Singapore pushed mandatory climate rules For most listed companies, they look at the risk of undermining their reputation as an early engine in the region.
This story was updated with the response of the Singapore government
🔗 Read more at: Source
Hashtags: #Protection #people #fossil #fuel #companies #governmental #organizations #Singapore #call #increased #carbon #tax #transparency #News #Environmental #works
📰 Published by on 2025-09-09 09:39:00
Via Eco-Business: News, Opinion, Jobs, Events, Press Releases and Research for topic Corporate Responsibility
🔥 “Protection of our people, not fossil fuel companies”: Non -governmental organizations in Singapore call for increased carbon tax transparency | News | Environmental works
explained
In an open message published on Tuesday, the groups argued that although the carbon tax pathway in Singapore is progress, the granting of transitional allowances to the intensive sectors of emissions, such as Reuters reported last yearIt risks the weakness of the policy ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
“Effective carbon tax must protect our people, not fossil fuel companies,” said the letter that he participated in signing by non -profit Energy Colab, SG Climate Rally and LePakinsg.
In response to the open message, Singapore The National Climate Change Secretariat (NCCS) said that the transitional allowances for high players help to avoid the risk of carbon leakage – companies whose operations are converting into other judicial states at lower or not effective carbon prices.
“
Recipient companies have sparked correct concerns about how to use information related to carbon tax allowances to settle their strategies and operations.
A spokeswoman for the National Climate Change Secretariat in Singapore
“This is especially important amid current political and economic winds facing climate work. This result may lead to the loss of jobs and economic value of Singapore, with the absence of a general global reduction in emissions,” NCCS spokesman said.
He added that “The allowances are not a free pass for our intensive emissions (EITE) companies to continue emission. It is only provided for a percentage of corporate emissions, and qualified facilities must have clear credibility carbon carbon. “
Large suits for the big players
Singapore provided the first carbon tax in Southeast Asia in 2019, which covers the facilities responsible for about 70 percent of the country’s emissions. The price rose to $ 25 (CO₂E) in 2024, and is scheduled to reach $ 45 Singapore ($ 35) in 2026-27, where the government indicates a price range ranging between $ 50 and 80 USD (39-62 USD) by 2030.
However, the transitional allowance system Large agreements have drawn audit. Non -governmental organizations note that there is currently no general information about the amount of distributed allowances, the criteria used to grant them, or that actual actual carbon tax companies end the payment.
Reuters report suggested last year that refining refineries and petrochemical companies had received discounts of up to 76 percent, which reduced their actual rate to less than $ 6 Singapore ($ 4.7 USD) per ton. At the same time, and The Strait The times mentioned In June 2025, expected tax revenues decreased 358 million dollars ($ 279 million), indicating that coverage had decreased from 70 percent of national emissions to 45 percent.
The letter said: “This doubts the comprehensiveness of the carbon tax in Singapore,” and called for a disclosure at the level of the facility about the allowances, clarity on standard standards, and the publication of effective rates. Without such information, NGOs warned that the system risks to become a “permanent aid” of pollutants.
In response to the assurances of NGOs about the disclosure of allowances, the government said that publishing this information “must be balanced against the need to protect the legitimate commercial sensitivities of our companies,” and said it would take place Adjust the collected information about the carbon tax allowances in the “due”.
NCCS said Reckon The amount of allowances by linking them to the standards of industry efficiency, to encourage facilities to continuously improve and “be among the most efficient in carbon in the world.”
She said that the amount of disclosure will be reviewed regularly, which represents factors such as our economic competitiveness as well as international and technological developments related to climate, such as
The effect of carbon tax on families
NGOs also raised concerns about the increasing electronic prices for consumers, as companies transfer the cost of the tax.
They urged the government to protect weak living families through permanent discounts or gradual pricing plans, noting that families contribute only 6.2 percent of national emissions.
Non-governmental organizations estimate that a tax ranging between $ 50 and $ 80 Singapore (39-62 USD per ton can add about $ 103 Singapore ($ 80) a year to an average bill for an apartment of four rooms.
NCCS said it was “conscious” One of the possible effect of carbon tax on the expenses of living families, and government initiatives such as the $ 1.1 billion living package (857 million US dollars) were martyred to motivate families to reduce their carbon difficulty.
A meaningful general advice
The open message was also pressed for useful public advice before the government reviewed the carbon tax levels after 2028. While previous consultations attracted a strong participation-there were 580 respondents to the “carbon removal trip” exercise for the year 2024-the government did not always spread detailed responses to the notes, and noticed non-profit organizations.
“Public consultations cannot be a mono -directional exercise,” said the message. “Any deviation from the levels of carbon tax is clearly planned, with the detection of the stakeholders who support it.”
Non -governmental organizations called for the long time schedules of consultation, the use of citizens ’paintings, and the publication of each of the topics of comments and government responses to ensure the” closed reactions episode “.
NGOs said that Singapore has committed to reducing its emissions to 45-50 million tons by 2035, a decrease from about 60 million tons in 2030, and to reach zero zero by 2050.
“Transparency does not harm us; it makes our climatic policies stronger,” they wrote, warning that without repairs, allowances and exemptions can reduce the credibility of the tax and slow down the Singapore Structural Transitional needs.
NCCS said in response. ““The private sector and the civil society are constantly involved in setting climate policies, and holding a general consultation in 2017 to request notes on carbon tax policy.
The government said it would share more information about the carbon tax track after 2017 “in time.”
The open message appears in the following week Singapore pushed mandatory climate rules For most listed companies, they look at the risk of undermining their reputation as an early engine in the region.
This story was updated with the response of the Singapore government
👉 Read more at: Source
Explore more: #Protection #people #fossil #fuel #companies #governmental #organizations #Singapore #call #increased #carbon #tax #transparency #News #Environmental #works
Authored by on 2025-09-09 09:39:00
From: Eco-Business: News, Opinion, Jobs, Events, Press Releases and Research for topic Corporate Responsibility