Question and Answer: A “comprehensive” approach to the long -awaited ASEAN power network News | Environmental works
Latest Job Opportunities in India
Discover top job listings and career opportunities across India. Stay updated with the latest openings in IT, government, and more.
Check Out Jobs!Read More
✨ Question and Answer: A “comprehensive” approach to the long -awaited ASEAN power network News | Environmental works
shared
ASEAN had dreamed of a regional power network since the 1990s, with a vision to develop energy resources for both the ten member states and build interdependence between them. The ASAN strength network (APG) was mentioned for the first time as a concept in the strategic vision of the bloc statement In 1997 APG Memorandum for Understanding (Memorandum of Understanding) It was signed in 2007 and was applied in 2009, which increased the consolidation of ASEAN’s goal of energy security and border energy communications.
The realization that this vision was not without challenges – as a result of the varied energy scene in the bloc, which means issues ranging Excessive dependence on liquefied natural gasSolar energy, which holds the idea of a interconnected network. Asian had to Move Wealth gap between member states and the lack of joint regional energy policy.
However, the program continues with a foot A goal to establish The fully integrated network operations by 2045. It is a time goal where it is expected to require energy demand in Southeast Asia More than twice 2022 levels by 2050.
Asian is also preparing to sign APG strengthening the memorandum of understanding In October, which is expected to specify a road map for implementation, Dialogue Earth spoke to Matthew David Vitinstein, Head of Energy Communication at the United Nations Economic and Social Committee for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), on how a different approach to APG affects its future.
“
In the ASEAN region, progress in many sustainable development goals is backward, including SDG 5 (gender equality), SDG 7 (energy at reasonable and clean prices), SDG 8 (decent work and economic growth), SDG 10 (low inequality) and SDG 13 (climate procedure).
Matthew David Vitinstein, Head of Energy Communication, the United Nations Economic and Social Committee of Asia and the Pacific (Desp)
Discuss the committee’s invitation to “Total“Apg’s approach, which involves looking beyond technical methods to build permanent and fair regional cooperation. This conversation was edited for clarity and length.
Why is the “holistic” approach to developing the necessary Asian Force Network?
This approach – which expands the focus to include social and comprehensive dimensions and political dimensions – is necessary because the transition to the regional energy network requires more than just technical integration of energy systems. the benefitsLike low electricity costs and the ability to reduce carbon emissions, they are well and recognized. However, it was not enough to address decisive fears, such as politics and sovereignty Risk Associated with bonding across the border.
For example, some Asian member states may be concerned that regional integration may require abandoning a level of control of national energy security or governance. In addition, concerns about potential disorders, effects on costs or excessive dependence on energy systems in neighboring countries increase the complexity of decisions.
The overall view of the long -term benefits of regional cooperation, strengthening shares and ensuring that all member states of the ASEAN, including smaller and developing countries, are not only benefiting from reasonable, reliable and sustainable energy, but also one of the advantages of full society.
This broader approach helps emphasize regional economic growth and create job opportunities and joint infrastructure, which enhances economic integration. Energy security is also covered by showing that through cooperation, integrated energy systems actually improve the reliability of the energy system, reduce dependency on imported fuel and help reduce energy deficiency.
By integrating these factors in a coherent vision of a connected region, Asian countries can provide a more persuaded issue of APG, address political concerns and show how the network can create mutual benefits to all the countries concerned.
How to shorten the traditional measures of energy connection?
The traditional metrics of energy connection often focus mainly on technical efficiency (such as the capacity of transportation or the cost of infrastructure) without fully regarding the aspects of social, environmental and long -term sustainability.
Such measures have a narrow economic focus, and often give priority to providing costs in the short term and immediate returns on economic growth in the long term, social inclusiveness and climate flexibility.
Another drawback in traditional measures is to exclude social stocks. It may neglect the standards that do not merge aspects of social integration – such as gender equality or energy access to disadvantaged societies – the need for policies that reduce energy poverty.
They also have restrictions with flexibility. These standards often do not explain the dynamic nature of energy systems, as future technological changes, organizational transformations, or advanced societal requirements may affect long -term benefits of the network.
How is cost -and -returning analyzes of energy communication projects affected by current standards?
In the current traditional cost analysis (CBA), priority is usually given direct financial costs for projects of these projects (such as infrastructure investments, operating costs) and immediate economic returns (such as energy generation and sales).
However, CBA current scales often fail to obtain long -term benefits such as improved health results and job creation. In addition, the social costs of inequality in energy, the possibility of development to damage ecosystems and cultural heritage sites, and often overlooking the effects on weak societies. Combating, these can reduce real costs and energy communication benefits, and a distorted evaluation of its net benefits.
What kind of mechanisms can be provided to measure the environmental effects of the Asian power network?
Methods that consider biological diversity and land use and water resources-such as environmental impact assessments (EIA), and land change designers and community surveys-can be used to study the environmental footprint of APG. We can also integrate LCAS reviews, which evaluate the environmental impact of a full life cycle of infrastructure projects such as energy networks, from design, construction to operation and stopping operation.
For APG, LCAS can be used to measure the environmental footprint for power generation, transmission and distribution infrastructure, evaluation of carbon emissions, resource consumption and waste generation.
LCAS can also help determine the chances of reducing emissions by improving network design for efficiency and integrating cleaner energy technologies.
It also works to ensure priority for long -term sustainability by assessing the full environmental impact on the entire APG life cycle. This helps to reduce environmental damage while increasing economic and social benefits to the maximum.
By integrating LCAS, APG can be designed with a clear understanding of its environmental costs and opportunities to improve, ensuring that regional communication and national development goals are supported.
Can you talk about the Green Power Corridor framework suggested by Escap and how is it related to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in the ASEAN region?
Green Energy Corridor (GPC) range It is a comprehensive approach designed to direct energy communication projects to be compatible with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS). The framework integrates the principles of sustainability in six major building blocks of power connection: political commitment, infrastructure development, organizational frameworks, community participation, institutional ability and financing mechanisms.
The framework also includes a set of metrics to assess the extent to which these initiatives contribute to achieving the sustainable development goals. In the end, the framework aims to encourage improving positive effects and alleviate negative effects through political interventions or project design and implementation.
In the ASEAN region, progress in many sustainable development goals DelayIncluding SDG 5 (gender equality), SDG 7 (powerful and clean prices), SDG 8 (decent work and economic growth), SDG 10 (low inequality) and SDG 13 (climate work).
These SDGs can be developed through strategic energy communication initiatives, and the GPC framework provides a tool for tracking and measuring improvements. By applying framework measures, ASEAN countries can better align their own energy projects with these critical development targets.
How can more connection via the Asian power network decrease the costs of electricity and air pollution?
APG can lead to low electricity costs, Low air pollution and Decreased emissions By developing the ability to share renewable energy, both in the sense of development projects and benefit from unrealized capabilities across sectors, in high -value sites throughout the region.
Increased use of renewable energy will reduce the need to generate high -cost fossil fuel and reduce air pollution from coal and gas factories. The integration of the regional network is also He increases Energy and elasticity of energy networks, which reduces the need for large reserves and investments in storage.
This article was originally published on Earth dialogue Under the creative public license.
🔗 Read more at: Read Now
Explore more: #Question #Answer #comprehensive #approach #long #awaited #ASEAN #power #network #News #Environmental #works
Authored by on 2025-09-16 11:41:00
Via Eco-Business: News, Opinion, Jobs, Events, Press Releases and Research for topic Energy
🔥 Question and Answer: A “comprehensive” approach to the long -awaited ASEAN power network News | Environmental works
shared
ASEAN had dreamed of a regional power network since the 1990s, with a vision to develop energy resources for both the ten member states and build interdependence between them. The ASAN strength network (APG) was mentioned for the first time as a concept in the strategic vision of the bloc statement In 1997 APG Memorandum for Understanding (Memorandum of Understanding) It was signed in 2007 and was applied in 2009, which increased the consolidation of ASEAN’s goal of energy security and border energy communications.
The realization that this vision was not without challenges – as a result of the varied energy scene in the bloc, which means issues ranging Excessive dependence on liquefied natural gasSolar energy, which holds the idea of a interconnected network. Asian had to Move Wealth gap between member states and the lack of joint regional energy policy.
However, the program continues with a foot A goal to establish The fully integrated network operations by 2045. It is a time goal where it is expected to require energy demand in Southeast Asia More than twice 2022 levels by 2050.
Asian is also preparing to sign APG strengthening the memorandum of understanding In October, which is expected to specify a road map for implementation, Dialogue Earth spoke to Matthew David Vitinstein, Head of Energy Communication at the United Nations Economic and Social Committee for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), on how a different approach to APG affects its future.
“
In the ASEAN region, progress in many sustainable development goals is backward, including SDG 5 (gender equality), SDG 7 (energy at reasonable and clean prices), SDG 8 (decent work and economic growth), SDG 10 (low inequality) and SDG 13 (climate procedure).
Matthew David Vitinstein, Head of Energy Communication, the United Nations Economic and Social Committee of Asia and the Pacific (Desp)
Discuss the committee’s invitation to “Total“Apg’s approach, which involves looking beyond technical methods to build permanent and fair regional cooperation. This conversation was edited for clarity and length.
Why is the “holistic” approach to developing the necessary Asian Force Network?
This approach – which expands the focus to include social and comprehensive dimensions and political dimensions – is necessary because the transition to the regional energy network requires more than just technical integration of energy systems. the benefitsLike low electricity costs and the ability to reduce carbon emissions, they are well and recognized. However, it was not enough to address decisive fears, such as politics and sovereignty Risk Associated with bonding across the border.
For example, some Asian member states may be concerned that regional integration may require abandoning a level of control of national energy security or governance. In addition, concerns about potential disorders, effects on costs or excessive dependence on energy systems in neighboring countries increase the complexity of decisions.
The overall view of the long -term benefits of regional cooperation, strengthening shares and ensuring that all member states of the ASEAN, including smaller and developing countries, are not only benefiting from reasonable, reliable and sustainable energy, but also one of the advantages of full society.
This broader approach helps emphasize regional economic growth and create job opportunities and joint infrastructure, which enhances economic integration. Energy security is also covered by showing that through cooperation, integrated energy systems actually improve the reliability of the energy system, reduce dependency on imported fuel and help reduce energy deficiency.
By integrating these factors in a coherent vision of a connected region, Asian countries can provide a more persuaded issue of APG, address political concerns and show how the network can create mutual benefits to all the countries concerned.
How to shorten the traditional measures of energy connection?
The traditional metrics of energy connection often focus mainly on technical efficiency (such as the capacity of transportation or the cost of infrastructure) without fully regarding the aspects of social, environmental and long -term sustainability.
Such measures have a narrow economic focus, and often give priority to providing costs in the short term and immediate returns on economic growth in the long term, social inclusiveness and climate flexibility.
Another drawback in traditional measures is to exclude social stocks. It may neglect the standards that do not merge aspects of social integration – such as gender equality or energy access to disadvantaged societies – the need for policies that reduce energy poverty.
They also have restrictions with flexibility. These standards often do not explain the dynamic nature of energy systems, as future technological changes, organizational transformations, or advanced societal requirements may affect long -term benefits of the network.
How is cost -and -returning analyzes of energy communication projects affected by current standards?
In the current traditional cost analysis (CBA), priority is usually given direct financial costs for projects of these projects (such as infrastructure investments, operating costs) and immediate economic returns (such as energy generation and sales).
However, CBA current scales often fail to obtain long -term benefits such as improved health results and job creation. In addition, the social costs of inequality in energy, the possibility of development to damage ecosystems and cultural heritage sites, and often overlooking the effects on weak societies. Combating, these can reduce real costs and energy communication benefits, and a distorted evaluation of its net benefits.
What kind of mechanisms can be provided to measure the environmental effects of the Asian power network?
Methods that consider biological diversity and land use and water resources-such as environmental impact assessments (EIA), and land change designers and community surveys-can be used to study the environmental footprint of APG. We can also integrate LCAS reviews, which evaluate the environmental impact of a full life cycle of infrastructure projects such as energy networks, from design, construction to operation and stopping operation.
For APG, LCAS can be used to measure the environmental footprint for power generation, transmission and distribution infrastructure, evaluation of carbon emissions, resource consumption and waste generation.
LCAS can also help determine the chances of reducing emissions by improving network design for efficiency and integrating cleaner energy technologies.
It also works to ensure priority for long -term sustainability by assessing the full environmental impact on the entire APG life cycle. This helps to reduce environmental damage while increasing economic and social benefits to the maximum.
By integrating LCAS, APG can be designed with a clear understanding of its environmental costs and opportunities to improve, ensuring that regional communication and national development goals are supported.
Can you talk about the Green Power Corridor framework suggested by Escap and how is it related to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in the ASEAN region?
Green Energy Corridor (GPC) range It is a comprehensive approach designed to direct energy communication projects to be compatible with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS). The framework integrates the principles of sustainability in six major building blocks of power connection: political commitment, infrastructure development, organizational frameworks, community participation, institutional ability and financing mechanisms.
The framework also includes a set of metrics to assess the extent to which these initiatives contribute to achieving the sustainable development goals. In the end, the framework aims to encourage improving positive effects and alleviate negative effects through political interventions or project design and implementation.
In the ASEAN region, progress in many sustainable development goals DelayIncluding SDG 5 (gender equality), SDG 7 (powerful and clean prices), SDG 8 (decent work and economic growth), SDG 10 (low inequality) and SDG 13 (climate work).
These SDGs can be developed through strategic energy communication initiatives, and the GPC framework provides a tool for tracking and measuring improvements. By applying framework measures, ASEAN countries can better align their own energy projects with these critical development targets.
How can more connection via the Asian power network decrease the costs of electricity and air pollution?
APG can lead to low electricity costs, Low air pollution and Decreased emissions By developing the ability to share renewable energy, both in the sense of development projects and benefit from unrealized capabilities across sectors, in high -value sites throughout the region.
Increased use of renewable energy will reduce the need to generate high -cost fossil fuel and reduce air pollution from coal and gas factories. The integration of the regional network is also He increases Energy and elasticity of energy networks, which reduces the need for large reserves and investments in storage.
This article was originally published on Earth dialogue Under the creative public license.
👉 Read more at: Read Now
Hashtags: #Question #Answer #comprehensive #approach #long #awaited #ASEAN #power #network #News #Environmental #works
📰 Published by on 2025-09-16 11:41:00
Via Eco-Business: News, Opinion, Jobs, Events, Press Releases and Research for topic Energy